Follow the Money

Contracts

Flock doesn't sell hardware — it leases a subscription. Here's what that actually costs, and who's really paying for it.

The Pricing Model

Municipalities and HOAs typically pay $2,500–$3,000 per camera per year, plus a one-time installation fee of $300–$350 per camera. Confirmed That fee covers everything — maintenance, AWS GovCloud data hosting, cellular data, and automatic hardware upgrades. A damaged or relocated camera costs an extra $750. Confirmed

This subscription model is the entire reason Flock could scale so fast: it removed the upfront capital cost (wiring, server infrastructure, permitting) that made legacy ALPR systems expensive to deploy.

Known Contracts

City of Oakland, CA$2,000,000Multi-YearHundreds of municipal ALPR cameras, General Fund
Richmond Police Dept.$1,003,6742024–2026Gunshot sensors + ALPR cameras
City of Denver$666,000Proposed RenewalRejected by City Council over ICE data-sharing concerns
Cobb County Police$213,000Annual70+ active county-wide cameras
Michigan City Police$180,000Multi-Year30 additional units, funded via congressional earmark
City of Yorba Linda$114,6001 Year (Initial)36 cameras at $2.5k/yr + $13.8k install
Village of Grafton$87,5005 YearsLocked-in subscription, Capital Improvement Program
Town of Harrison$57,348Multi-YearRekor system, funded by state grants

The Taxpayer Total — A Projection, Not an Audit

No government agency has published an audited national total for ALPR spending. We can build a transparent estimate from confirmed inputs: of roughly 90,000 active cameras, an estimated 60% are under government contract — about 54,000 cameras. At $2,500 per camera per year, that's roughly $135 million a year in recurring subscription fees alone, nationwide. AllegedThis excludes installation, relocation, and add-on sensors like audio detection — so it's a floor, not a ceiling.

How Federal Grants Hide the Real Cost

DHS State Homeland Security Program Grants

Santa Cruz, CA used SHSP funds for entry/exit corridor cameras. Sumner, WA used a $50,000 federal grant to cover its entire first year — then was on the hook for $39,000/year afterward.

DOJ COPS Technology & Hiring Grants

Auburn, ME launched its system using federal pandemic-era grants. Once that funding expired, $26,000/year in maintenance costs shifted to local taxpayers.

Congressional Community Project Funding

Michigan City, IN secured a $180,000 direct congressional earmark to add 30 cameras to its existing 30-camera grid.

The pattern across all three: a grant covers the launch cost, the council never has to hold a real budget vote on the ongoing expense, and by the time the bill becomes a permanent local-tax line item, the system is already running and politically harder to remove. Alleged